Ryan Pyle Blog: Losing 12,640 images at US$7 per Image

Hello,

I know this topic has already made it's way around the blogs, but I'm still disgusted by the ruling. The "A Photo Editor" Blog reported a few weeks back that photographer Chris Usher was in a legal battle with Corbis, who somehow misplaced some 12, 640 negatives. Now, it turns out this Chris won this case in November 2007, and the exact compensation was supposed to be declared at a later date, but it was ruled that Corbis was at fault. Well, the compensation decided was US$7 per image; in other words Chris lost his appeal for greater compensation.

While US$7 per image, or US$88,000 may seem like a lot of money to some folks, it is peanuts for what 12,640 strong images can earn in the right image archive over 10 or 20 years. It's not uncommon to sell a stock image for US$200 to a publication, and then the next month sell it again for US$150 to another publication. So the life span of an image, and the income a photographer can earn from that, is a long long time. Which is one reason why we work so damn hard.

This ruling now basically gives precedence to any further ruling of a similar kind. That basically means that any magazine, newspaper or agency that asks you to hand over your negatives can neglect to care for them and basically get away with it with a slap on the wrist, or US$7 per image - which is peanuts.

I can't tell you how disgusted this ruling makes me feel. Everywhere I turn in the last few months I just see photographers taking a shit kicking.

I've had magazines in the past ask me for my negatives and I've blatantly refused on every occasion; and this kind of case just reinforces my decision. My negatives are my negatives, and if a court of law isn't going to bother protecting a photographers negatives from poor business practice, poor organization and complete disregard, then you should never hand them over - ever.

No one is going to care for your negatives as well as you do, so passing them over to someone else just opens the door for an accident to happen. Hold your negatives dear to your heart, and never let them go unless someone is willing to pry them out of your cold, dead hand. Isn't that the slogan from the National Rifles Association?

Extreme, perhaps. Like I said with my opening, I'm disgusted by this ruling, and it's embarrassing to an agency like Corbis which was created to protect image rights and share in the profit, with photographers, of properly managing the rights to large image archives.

Blackstar have a some great background on the case on their BLOG. Enjoy the read. And, do you know where your negatives are tonight? Bloody nightmare.

--
Ryan Pyle
Photographer
ryan@ryanpyle.com
Website: www.ryanpyle.com
Archive: http://archive.ryanpyle.com
_______________________________________

Ryan Pyle Blog: Caring for your Image Collection

Hello,

I'm not ashamed to say it, I'm a film man. Now as a film man one has certain problems, like how to shoot film and turn it around fast enough to satisfy editors used to working with digital photographers; and I can manage that. My newest problem these days, as my career lengthens, is film storage.

I shoot about 10-15 rolls of 35mm each day I work. So on a 5 days assignment I could end up with 75 rolls of film on my hands. Processing, making an edit and having them scanned are crucial to the process, but bagging them and tagging them afterwards is equally important. Why?

I take great comfort in knowing that my photographic archive is physically sitting in my spare bedroom, which I've turned in to a dark room, and not on some fidgity hard drive that may or may not fail some day. Often enough I need to track down a negative and rescan it or bring a series of images to my printer. In other words I am constantly going back to the negative, so keeping them safe and well organized is in my best interest. But how is this done?

There are lots of rumors and misinformation out there. I've found that humidity and direct light are two of the main threats that need to be removed, a difficult task for anyone living in sweaty/sticky Asia. Low temperature storage is best, removal of all potential sunlight is important to achieve that. I could go on and on but instead I'll just pass along the link with all details, which can be found on this site: "Caring For Your Collection", which is published by the National Library of Congress.

Best of luck to everyone in keeping their collections dry, cold and safe for decades to come.

--

Ryan Pyle
Photographer
ryan@ryanpyle.com
Website: www.ryanpyle.com
Archive: http://archive.ryanpyle.com
_______________________________________